This page follows analyses and recreates some plots from Schulz J et al. (2017) PLOS ONE 12(6): e0179915.
Overall network size: 170 holdings active over the observed time period
month | holdings active (n) | holdings active (prop.) |
---|---|---|
Jan 2019 | 29 | 0.171 |
Feb 2019 | 10 | 0.059 |
Mar 2019 | 8 | 0.047 |
Apr 2019 | 15 | 0.088 |
May 2019 | 6 | 0.035 |
Jun 2019 | 16 | 0.094 |
Jul 2019 | 22 | 0.129 |
Aug 2019 | 20 | 0.118 |
Sep 2019 | 18 | 0.106 |
Oct 2019 | 22 | 0.129 |
Nov 2019 | 14 | 0.082 |
Dec 2019 | 18 | 0.106 |
Overall number of movements: 100 movements over the
observed time period
Overall number of edges: 100 different links between
holdings over the observed time period
Overall edge density: 0.003 of all possible links
between holdings are observed over the observed time period
month | movements (n) | movements (prop.) | edges (n) | edges (prop.) | edge density (prop.) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 2019 | 15 | 0.150 | 15 | 0.150 | 0.001 |
Feb 2019 | 5 | 0.050 | 5 | 0.050 | 0.000 |
Mar 2019 | 4 | 0.040 | 4 | 0.040 | 0.000 |
Apr 2019 | 8 | 0.080 | 8 | 0.080 | 0.000 |
May 2019 | 3 | 0.030 | 3 | 0.030 | 0.000 |
Jun 2019 | 8 | 0.080 | 8 | 0.080 | 0.000 |
Jul 2019 | 11 | 0.110 | 11 | 0.110 | 0.000 |
Aug 2019 | 10 | 0.100 | 10 | 0.100 | 0.000 |
Sep 2019 | 9 | 0.090 | 9 | 0.090 | 0.000 |
Oct 2019 | 11 | 0.110 | 11 | 0.110 | 0.000 |
Nov 2019 | 7 | 0.070 | 7 | 0.070 | 0.000 |
Dec 2019 | 9 | 0.090 | 9 | 0.090 | 0.000 |
month | min | Q1 | median | mean | Q3 | max |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 2019 | 42 | 54.50 | 74.0 | 91.800 | 115.50 | 185 |
Feb 2019 | 46 | 73.00 | 97.0 | 96.800 | 108.00 | 160 |
Mar 2019 | 30 | 39.75 | 50.5 | 64.250 | 75.00 | 126 |
Apr 2019 | 33 | 39.75 | 53.5 | 75.500 | 98.50 | 157 |
May 2019 | 89 | 101.00 | 113.0 | 128.333 | 148.00 | 183 |
Jun 2019 | 59 | 120.75 | 140.0 | 132.000 | 162.00 | 178 |
Jul 2019 | 39 | 71.50 | 90.0 | 99.182 | 123.50 | 181 |
Aug 2019 | 31 | 51.50 | 104.5 | 98.800 | 128.25 | 177 |
Sep 2019 | 41 | 108.00 | 122.0 | 124.778 | 147.00 | 183 |
Oct 2019 | 47 | 90.50 | 125.0 | 124.455 | 166.00 | 187 |
Nov 2019 | 76 | 116.50 | 134.0 | 135.143 | 159.00 | 185 |
Dec 2019 | 42 | 65.00 | 151.0 | 123.556 | 159.00 | 172 |
The largest giant strongly connected component (GSCC) is
the largest number of nodes (holdings) that can all reach each other by
some directed path of movements. This means that any node in that set
could indirectly infect any other, or that a single source outbreak
within the component could theoretically infect anything else within
that component.
The giant in-component (GIC) consists of all nodes
(holdings) that can reach the GSCC, but are not part of it, because
there is no directed path from the GSCC to these nodes. This means that
any holding in this set could infect holdings in the GSCC, but not be
infected by them.
Conversely, the giant out-component (GOC) consists of all
nodes (holdings) that can be reached from the GSCC, but are not part of
it, because there is no directed path from these nodes to the GSCC. This
means that any holding in this set could be infected by holdings in the
GSCC, but not infect them.
This is a measure of consistency in the network between
different points in time. Darker colours indicate a larger proportion of
trades that are in common between two months. The black diagonal
indicates that each month’s movements are identical to themselves.